Ads
  • Aeropuertos
  • Comercial
  • Fabricantes
  • Militar
Aviacionline
  • Accidents and Incidents

    Missed by that much: Alaska’s Boeing 737 MAX -9 was set to enter maintenance hours after door blowout

    13 de marzo de 2024 - 01:11
    Missed by that much: Alaska’s Boeing 737 MAX -9 was set to enter maintenance hours after door blowout
    Ads

    On a scheduled flight from Portland to Ontario, California, a Boeing 737 MAX 9 operated by Alaska Airlines encountered a serious midflight emergency when a piece of the fuselage unexpectedly detached at 16,000 feet. This occurred just hours before a scheduled maintenance check intended to address previously noted issues with the aircraft’s pressurization system.

    Ads

    Scheduled Maintenance and Warning Signs

    The aircraft displayed warning signals related to its pressurization system on the days leading up to the incident and a month prior. Despite these warnings, the decision was made to proceed with the flight, with restrictions placed on over-water travel until a comprehensive check could be performed.

    Investigations Underway

    The incident has triggered multiple investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and even led to a criminal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department, focusing on Boeing’s quality control and the scheduled maintenance by Alaska Airlines.

    Alaska Airlines has affirmed that its aircraft maintenance plan and schedule adhere strictly to all established processes and procedures, ensuring no immediate need to pull any aircraft from service for maintenance issues that don’t require it.

    This comes after concerns were raised over pressurization warning lights and a stiff passenger door handle, slated for a routine safety check. The airline’s spokesperson clarified to The Seattle Times that such maintenance work, while necessary, did not indicate a critical safety concern that would necessitate grounding the aircraft.

    Ads

    In a detailed explanation to The New York Times, Donald Wright, Vice President for Maintenance and Engineering, revealed that the warning signals in question had activated twice in the past ten days, prompting a review but not reaching the threshold for more drastic measures unless triggered three times within a similar period.

    Max Tidwell, Vice President for Safety and Security, also expressed confidence in the decision-making process, stating that after reviewing all data and leading indicators, there was no compelling reason to alter the current maintenance approach, underscoring the airline’s commitment to safety without overreacting to standard maintenance flags.

    In response to the incident, Alaska Airlines has emphasized confidence in their maintenance and safety protocols, while cooperating fully with the ongoing NTSB investigation. The incident has spotlighted the importance of stringent maintenance schedules and raised questions regarding the oversight and safety of Boeing’s 737 MAX series.

    Temas
    • 737
    • Alaska
    • Boeing
    • Featured
    • MAX
    AUTOR
    Pablo Diaz (Diazpez)
    Pablo Diaz (Diazpez)

    Desde 2017, haciendo periodismo aeronáutico. Award-Winning Journalist: Ganador de la edición 2023 de "Periodismo de Altura", otorgado por ALTA. Facts don't care about your feelings.

    Comentarios

    Para comentar, debés estar registradoPor favor, iniciá sesión

    INGRESA
    Ads
    Ads
Aviacionline
Categorias
  • Comercial
  • Militar
  • Aviación Sostenible
  • Infraestructura
  • Aviación Ejecutiva
  • General
  • Carga Aérea
  • English Feed
2025 | Aviacionline | Todos los derechos reservados: www.aviacionline.comDirectores: Edgardo Gimenez Mazó y Pablo Díaz
Términos y condicionesPrivacidadCentro de ayuda
Powered by
artic logo