Mexico Reforms Airport Slot Allocation to Align with IATA Global Standards
The Mexican government published a regulatory framework that dismantles the previous model and redesigns the access rules for key terminals such as Mexico City International Airport (AICM).
/https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2022/05/mexico-nocturna-scaled.jpg)
The capacity management system at Mexico's most congested airports is undergoing a fundamental transformation. Through the Official Gazette of the Federation, the Mexican government published the new "General Bases for the assignment of landing and takeoff slots in airports under saturated conditions," a regulatory framework that dismantles the previous model and redesigns the access rules for key terminals, such as the Mexico City International Airport (AICM).
The reform, published on October 14, modernizes the country's aviation policy by adopting global standards recommended by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) in its Worldwide Airport Slot Guidelines (WASG). The most profound change is the elimination of the inherent conflict of interest in the former system, where the airport administrator was also the entity assigning the valuable slots (landing and takeoff times).
The cornerstone of the reform is the complete restructuring of the institutional framework. It is not a simple bureaucratic reshuffle, but a philosophical shift from administrative allocation to independent governance.
Under the 2017 rules, the Airport Administrator had the final authority to assign slots. This created a system vulnerable to perceptions of bias, as the entity controlling the airport infrastructure also controlled market access for the airlines that are its customers and competitors.
The new regulation pulverizes this model. It creates the Slot Coordinator, an entity designated by the Federal Civil Aviation Agency (AFAC) and explicitly required to be "functionally and technically independent" from the airport, the airlines, and any other interested party. This is a direct adoption of the European model, where the coordinator's independence is considered the foundation of a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory system.
The Coordinator is not just an allocator; it is a supervisor. It is empowered to monitor the entire lifecycle of a slot, using data from air navigation services, the airport, and the airlines themselves to ensure compliance. This institutional redesign also rebalances the entire ecosystem:
The Airport Administrator is relegated to an execution role, responsible for implementing the schedule set by the Coordinator.
The Delays Subcommittee is elevated to the status of a binding and independent arbiter. Its ruling on the cause of a delay is final, preventing the Coordinator from making arbitrary decisions about an airline's performance.
A new Slot Coordination and Supervision Subcommittee is created as a formal channel for collaboration among all stakeholders.
This institutional redesign seeks to balance operational stability for established airlines with the creation of real opportunities for new entrants. The new governance aims to foster a data-driven, collaborative, and more closely supervised allocation process.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is an airport slot?
A slot is a permit granted by a coordinator for an aircraft to land or take off at a congested airport on a specific date and time. It is the most critical asset for an airline's route planning.
Why is an independent coordinator important?
An independent coordinator ensures that slot allocation is neutral, transparent, and non-discriminatory. It prevents the airport operator, which has its own commercial interests, from favoring certain airlines over others.
How does this affect passengers?
In the medium term, increased competition driven by new airlines gaining access to key markets like AICM could translate into more flight options, routes, and potentially more competitive fares.
Which airlines benefit most from this change?
Low-cost carriers (LCCs) and new competitors are the main beneficiaries, as the new regulation guarantees them a clearer and fairer path to obtain slots at previously hard-to-access airports.
An 80/20 Rule and the End of Double Jeopardy
To align Mexico with international practice, the reform adjusts the "use-it-or-lose-it" rule. The utilization requirement for a slot series to retain historic ("grandfather") rights is reduced from 85% to 80%. This is the global standard that offers operators a reasonable operational margin to handle disruptions.
Furthermore, a "double jeopardy" clause has been eliminated: previously, an airline could lose its slots not only for low usage but also if more than 15% of its flights were delayed. Under the new scheme, punctuality remains a compliance factor, but it no longer directly threatens the possession of historic slots, reducing operational uncertainty for the companies.
Boosting Competition and Curbing Speculation
The reform actively strengthens competition. The definition of a "new entrant air carrier" is expanded to include airlines holding fewer than seven daily slots, instead of five. Crucially, the rule that allocates 50% of all available slots in the pool to these new competitors is maintained, opening a wider door to energize the market.
To combat speculation, the new regulation imposes stricter conditions for slot transfers. Airlines must now operate a slot for at least two equivalent seasons before they can transfer it. If the slot was obtained under new entrant status, the holding period extends to four seasons. This measure ensures that slots are used to provide sustained services and not as assets for short-term trading.
One of the most important practical changes is the creation of a more robust compliance and enforcement regime. The Slot Coordinator is empowered with proactive monitoring capabilities and a much more detailed definition of what constitutes an infringement.
The definition of slot misuse is expanded from a narrow focus on simply not using a slot to a detailed eight-point list. This list now includes more subtle but equally disruptive forms of non-compliance, such as:
Operating a flight at a time significantly different from the one allocated.
Creating a repeated pattern of intentionally off-schedule operations.
Using a different aircraft type or route than declared without prior notification.
This recognizes that airport efficiency is undermined not just by cancellations, but by any operation that deviates from the coordinated plan.
To enforce this, the Coordinator has a tiered set of sanctions, including the revocation of historic rights, assignment of a lower priority for future requests, or, in serious cases, the withdrawal of the entire slot series for the current season. This creates a powerful incentive for airlines to maintain strict operational discipline.
Perhaps one of the pillars of the reform is the mandate for transparency. The airport administrator is now required to publish an exhaustive list of information on a public website, including:
A complete list of all assigned slots and which airline holds them.
Complete historical slot data for each company.
A real-time list of available ad-hoc slots.
Monthly compliance reports from the Coordinator, detailing the usage percentages and delays for each slot series.
All rulings from the Delays Subcommittee.
All findings of intentional slot misuse and the actions taken.
Full details of all authorized slot assignments, exchanges, and joint operations.
This level of public scrutiny acts as a control mechanism, allowing any competitor to audit the performance of others and the impartiality of the system. In turn, the Coordinator receives greater powers to monitor and sanction the misuse of slots, such as systematically operating off-schedule or not using the declared aircraft, with a tiered penalty system that can escalate to the withdrawal of the entire slot series.
Para comentar, debés estar registradoPor favor, iniciá sesión