While the official investigation of the accident involving an Airbus A320neo operating for LATAM Perú and a Rescue vehicle is ongoing, an audio of ground control sequence during the time of the collision has been leaked, revealing that the limits of the authorization granted to the ARFF vehicle -a Rosenbauer Panther 6×6– that entered the active runway may have been exceeded.
The transcription of the communications indicate that the vehicle was authorized to approach up to ninety meters away from the runway axis, up to a set of cones placed on the vehicular track.
15:02:28: LAN 02213 taxi via Alpha 1 Alpha, holding point runway 16.
15:03:29: LAN 02213 when ready contact Lima tower 118.1.
15:03:59: Rescue 6, ground.
15:04:10: Position?
15:04:14: Notify Position.
15:04:22: Confirm close to runway Alpha.
15:04:32: Roger, standby.
15:04:59: Rescue 6, cleared approach, ninety meters away from runway axis, up to the cones on the vehicular track, side 1.
15:05:30: Repeat call ident.
15:08:04: Come in Rescue 6.
15:08:13: Stand by.
15:08:49: LAN 01286, taxi via Alpha, holding point runway 16.
15:08:59: Rescue 6, ground.
15:09:01: Confirming exercise.
15:09:07: A-ffirm.
15:09:45: LAN 02023, taxi via Alpha 1 towards south, position 76.
15:09:55: November 300 Eco Eco (N300EE), ground.
15:10:05: I copy you know 5/5, notify position and destination.
15:10:11: Roger. Hold position.
15:10:28: Rescue 6, roger.
15:10:36: SKY 05210, ground, good day. Taxi via Alpha, hold before Bravo.
15:10:45: Rescue station, repeat ident.
15:10:55: Rescue on sight, entering *** (unintelligible)
15:11:00: LAN Peru 2186, when ready contact Lima tower 118.1.
15:11:06: LAN Peru 2023, continue taxi alpha 1 alpha holding point runway 16.
15:11:17: JetSMART 7128 roger, taxi via Alpha, hold before Bravo.
15:11:47: Rescue, I repeat, Rescue: aircraft damaged in runway.
15:12:26: Rescue in sight, rescue unit cleared to enter runway.
This piece of information, among others, will be key for investigators to reconstruct the events that led to the accident that caused the death of two firefighters, several passengers injured and the first Airbus A320neo total hull loss.
El accidentado es Rescue 3 , no Rescue 6 que viene atrás. Además el vehículo no es un Rosenbauer Panther 6×6 sino un 4X4. Rescue 6 sí corresponde a la descripción pero NO ES EL VEHÍCULO ACCIDENTADO.
Claro, el que debió tener comunicación con superficie era el rescue 3 que iba adelante, pero también hay comunicación entre los carros bomberos, superficie siempre ha pensado que el vehículo era el rescue 6, por qué no coordinaron entre ellos?? Error humano que se pudo corregir solamente con comunicación, ademas error grande ingresar a la pista cuando todos los aviones estaban esperando turno para despegar.. las comunicaciones descordinadas siempre son un constante peligro…los bomberos deberían conocer lo básico sobre tránsito en superficie en el area de maniobras…deben tener mucho criterio para actuar.
Tremendo error, falla humana.
La falta de comunicación entre la torre de control y los protagonistas de este incidente , da como resultado el accidente ocurrido.
Falta de criterio.
Cómo diablos se les ocurre realizar drill de emergencia , teniendo tráfico activo en la pista de aterrizaje.
Increíble , solo en el Perú